Lived body and ascending dialectic. Reflections on Husserl and Marcel
reflexiones sobre Husserl y Marcel
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48075/k32wnz23Keywords:
Metaphysics, contingency, teleology, call, love, fidelityAbstract
Following viewpoints advanced by Claudinei Aparecido de Freitas da Silva, the article has as a starting point his analysis of the phenomenological distinction established by Edmund Husserl between Körper (objective body) and Leib (lived body) and its resignification in Gabriel Marcel’s phenomenology by means of the association of the lived body with a primal feeling (Urgefühl). Secondly, it is shown that the divergence of methods is balanced by convergences in the examination of particular problems―a kinship and discordance tressed by Paul Ricoeur. Husserl advocates an emotional intentionality directed to a secure hope and characterizes its distinctive traits as regards both religion, God, and hope. A similar analysis can be found in Marcel and renders possible a comparison point by point. Finally, it is shown that these standpoints bring forth two different manners of facing the relationship between hope tied to objects and worldly situations and hope opened to a transobjective, extramundane, and divine dimension. It is argued that the link between the two modes of hope is structured in each case as a teleological integration, an absolute contrast, or a reciprocal interaction.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aoristo - International Journal of Phenomenology, Hermeneutics and Metaphysics

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
1. I grant the AORISTO – International Journal of Phenomenology, Hermeneutics and Metaphysics the first publication of my article, licensed under Creative Commons Attribution (which allows sharing of work, recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal).
2. I confirm that my article is not being submitted to another publication and has not been published in its entirely on another journal. I take full responsibility for its originality and I will also claim responsibility for charges from claims by third parties concerning the authorship of the article.
3. I also agree that the manuscript will be submitted according to the Aoristo’s publication rules described above.
License Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0 Internacional, which allows you to share, copy, distribute, display, reproduce, in whole or in part, for as long as there is no commercial purpose, and authors and source are cited.