THE MOST RELEVANT ATTRIBUTES ON PURCHASE DECISION OF BEEF: A BEST-WORST SCORE APPROACH/Os atributos mais relevantes na decisão de compra de carne bovina: uma aproximação pela Pontuação Melhor-Pior

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48075/igepec.v24i2.24655

Palavras-chave:

consumer preference, quality perception, beef trade, Dracena.

Resumo


The aim of this study was to evaluate the most important attributes on beef purchase decision in the city of Dracena, State of Sao Paulo, Brazil. It was carried out face-to-face interviews using a structured questionnaire, in which was performed a Best-Worst Discrete Choice Experiment of case 1. The answers were analysed by Best-Worst Score. The preference heterogeneity was assessed through factorial analysis. It was found that the appearance of beef is the most important attribute on consumers’ purchase decision and it is followed by its freshness, packaging/expiry date, smell and texture. It was observed the existence of groups of consumers with different preferences by factors that group the evaluated attributes. For example, men attach more importance to the attributes (organic and fat amount) of the healthy dimension while women give more importance to the attributes from expiry data/packaging dimension.

 

Biografia do Autor

Etiénne Groot, Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Tecnológicas, Dracena

Departamento de Produção Animal

Referências

ABIEC - Associação Brasileira Das Indústrias Exportadoras De Carnes. Perfil da pecuária no Brasil: Relatório anual 2017. 2018. Disponível em: <http://abiec.siteoficial.ws/images/upload/sumario-pt-010217.pdf>. Acesso em: 09 dez. 2019.

BARCELLOS, J.O.J. et al. Consumer perception of Traced beef. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 41, n. 3, p. 771-774, 2012.

BRUNSO, K.; FJORD, T.A.; GRUNERT, K.G. Consumers’ food choice and quality perception. Working paper ASB, n. 77, 2002: Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. Disponível em: <https://pure.au.dk/ws/files/32302886/wp77.pdf>. Acesso em: 15 fev. 2020.

CHRZAN, K.; PATTERSON, M. Testing for the optimal number of attributes in MaxDiff questions. Sawtooth Software Research Paper Series. 2006. Disponível em: <http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com>. Acesso em: 15 dez. 2019.

CICIA, G.; CEMBALO, L.; DEL GIUDICE, T. Country-of-origin effects on German peaches consumers. New Medit, v. 3, p. 75–79, 2012.

COHEN, E. Maximum Difference Scaling: Improved measures of importance and preference for segmentation. Sawtooth Software Research Papers Series. 2003. Disponível em: <http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/>. Acesso em: 10 nov. 2019.

DIAS, L.D.B. et al. Estudo sobre o padrão de consumo de carne bovina na cidade de Campo Grande, MS, Brasil. Boletim de Indústria Animal, v. 72, n. 2, p. 148 – 154, 2015.

EC - European Commission. Agriculture and Rural Development: DOOR. 2018. Disponível em: <http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/quality/door/list.html>. Acesso em: 16 jan. 2020.

FONT-I-FURNOLS, M.; GUERRERO, L. Consumer preference, behaviour and perception about meat and meat products: an overview. Meat Science, v. 98, p. 361-371, 2014.

FONT-I-FURNOLS, M. et al. Acceptability of lamb fed on pasture, concentrate or combinations of both systems by European consumers. Meat Science, v. 81, p. 196-202, 2009.

FORTIN, C.; GOODWIN, H.L.; THOMSEN, M. Consumer attitude toward Freshness Indicators on Perishable food products. Journal of Food Distribution Research, v. 40, n. 3, 2009.

GILLESPIE, J. et al. Grass-fed beef: How is it marketed by US producers? International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, v. 19, n. 2, p. 171 – 188, 2016.

GIOCOMAZZI, C.M. (2016). Atributos relevantes na decisão de compra de carne bovina. 2016. Dissertação (Mestrado em Agronegócio) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil. 2016.

GLITSCH, K. Consumer perceptions of fresh meat quality: cross-national comparison. British Food Journal, v. 102, n. 3, p. 177-194, 2010.

GRUNERT, K.G.; BREDAHL, L.; BRUNSO, K. Consumer perception of meat quality and implications for product development in the meat sector – a review. Meat Science, v. 66, p. 259–272, 2004.

IBGE. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. IBGE Cidades. 2018. Disponível em: <https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/brasil/sp/dracena/panorama>. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2020.

ILLICHMANN, R.; ABDULAI, A. Analysis of consumer preference and Willingness-to-pay for organic Food Products in Germany. In: AAEA & CAES JOINT ANNUAL MEETING, 2013, Washington, DC, US. Anais [...]; Washington, 2013. Disponível em: <https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/880f/054e2619587bd2c88c46f72b0f6ddeca80a6.pdf>. Acesso em: 20 jan. 2020.

INPI. Instituto Nacional de Propriedade Industrial. Pedidos de indicação geográfica concedidos e em andamento. 2018. Disponível em: <http://www.inpi.gov.br/menu-servicos/indicacao-geografica/pedidos-de-indicacao-geografica-no-brasil>. Acesso em: 12 fev. 2020.

LOUVIERE, J.J.; ISLAM, T. A. Comparison of importance weights and willingness-to-pay measures derived from choice-based conjoint, constant sum scales and best-worst scaling. Journal of Business Research, v. 61, p. 903-911, 2006.

LOUVIERE, J.J. et al. An introduction to the application of (case 1) best-worst scaling in marketing research. International Journal of Research in Marketing, v. 30, n. 3, p. 292-303, 2013.

LOUVIERE, J.J. et al. Modelling the choices of individual decision – maker by combining efficient choice experiment designs with extra preference information. Journal of Choice Modelling, v. 1, n. 1, p. 128-163, 2009.

MENNECKE, B. E. et al. (2006). A study of the factors that influence consumer attitudes toward beef products using the conjoint market analysis tool. CARD Working paper 8, Iowa State University, Washington, USA. Disponível em: <https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1445&context=card_workingpapers>. Acesso em: 10 nov. 2019.

NGAPO, T.M. et al. (2013). Marbling and ageing – part 2. Consumer perception of sensory quality. Food Research International, v. 51, p. 985-999, 2013.

ORIA-ALMUDÍ R.A. Mantenimiento postcosecha de la calidad del Melocotón de Calanda. Informaciones técnicas: Dirección General de Tecnología Agraria, v. 96, p. 1-20, 2001.

ORME B. (2006). MaxDiff Designer v2. Sawtooth Software: Research Paper Series. Disponível em: <https://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/download/techpap/maxdiff_designer_manual.pdf>. Acesso em: 20 mar. 2020.

ORME B. (2005). Accuracy of HB estimation in MaxDiff experiments. Sawtooth Software: Research Paper Series. Disponível em: <https://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/download/techpap/maxdacc.pdf>. Acesso em: 20 mar. 2020.

PANNIER, L., et al. Associations of sire estimated breeding values and objective meat quality measurements with sensory scores in Australia lamb. Meat Science, v. 96, p. 1076-1087, 2014.

REALINI, C.E. et al. Spanish, French and British consumers’ acceptability of Uruguayan beef, and consumers’ beef choice associated with country of origin, finishing diet and meat price. Meat Science, v. 95, p. 14-21, 2013.

RESCONI, V.C. et al. Sensory quality of beef from different finishing diets. Meat Science, v. 86, p. 865-869, 2010.

SPARF, B.M. Protected Designation of Origin, Protected Geographical Indication: their significance for the grown of the food industries in France and Sweden. 2010. Dissertação (Mestre em Economia) - Faculty of Natural Resources and Agricultural Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Science, Uppsala, Sweden, 2010.

SUMAN, S.P. et al. Improving beef color stability: practical strategies and underlying mechanisms. Meat Science, v. 98, p. 490-504, 2014.

TRESPALACIOS J.A.; VÁZQUEZ R.; BELLO L. Investigación de mercados. Madrid: Ed. Thomson, 2005.

VERBEKE, W.; VIAENE, J. Beliefs, attitude and behavior towards fresh meat consumption in Belgium: empirical evidence from a consumer survey. Food Quality and Preference, v. 10, p. 437-445, 1999.

ZILIOTTO, M.R. et al. (2010). Comparação do custo de produção de bovino de corte: pasto versus confinamento. In: SIMPÓSIO DE EXCELÊNCIA EM GESTÃO E TECNOLOGIA, 7, 2010, Resende, RJ, Brasil. Anais [...]. Resende:AEDB, 2010. Disponível em: <https://www.aedb.br/seget/arquivos/artigos10/367_Artigo%20SEGET%20MEC.pdf>. Acesso em: 20 jan. 2020.

Downloads

Publicado

22-07-2020

Como Citar

GROOT, E. THE MOST RELEVANT ATTRIBUTES ON PURCHASE DECISION OF BEEF: A BEST-WORST SCORE APPROACH/Os atributos mais relevantes na decisão de compra de carne bovina: uma aproximação pela Pontuação Melhor-Pior. Informe GEPEC, [S. l.], v. 24, n. 2, p. 174–194, 2020. DOI: 10.48075/igepec.v24i2.24655. Disponível em: https://e-revista.unioeste.br/index.php/gepec/article/view/24655. Acesso em: 18 ago. 2022.

Edição

Seção

Artigos